Establishing additionality
Small-scale afforestation or reforestation (SSC A/R) project activities must demonstrate that they would not be implemented in the absence of CDM registration because of one or more barriers:
A simplified baseline and monitoring methodology listed in appendix B may be used for a small-scale afforestation or reforestation project activity under the CDM if the project participants are able to demonstrate to a DOE that the project activity would otherwise not be implemented due to the existence of one or more of the barriers listed in attachment A to appendix B. Where specified in appendix B for a project category, quantitative evidence that the project activity would otherwise not be implemented may be provided instead of a demonstration based on the barriers listed in attachment A to appendix B (6/CMP.1, Annex, paragraph 20).
Attachment A to Appendix B to the Annex of 6/CMP.1 requires the Executive Board to develop a list of barriers, at least one of which must be applicable to the SSC A/R project in order to demonstrate its additionality, as described below. These barriers are currently contained in the three approved SSC A/R methodologies available on the UNFCCC website.
Project participants in an SSC A/R project must demonstrate to a designated operational entity (DOE) that the project would not otherwise be implemented because of one of the listed barriers.
These barriers are as follows:
- Investment barriers, other than economic/financial barriers, inter alia:
- Debt funding not available for this type of project activity;
- No access to international capital markets due to real or perceived risks associated with domestic or foreign direct investment in the country where the project activity is to be implemented;
- Lack of access to credit.
- Institutional barriers, inter alia:
- Risk relating to changes in government policies or laws;
- Lack of enforcement of legislation relating to forest or land-use.
- Technological barriers, inter alia:
- Lack of access to planting materials;
- Lack of infrastructure for implementation of the technology.
- Barriers relating to local tradition, inter alia:
- Traditional knowledge or lack thereof, of laws and customs, market conditions, practices;
- Traditional equipment and technology;
- Barriers due to prevailing practice, inter alia:
- The project activity is the "first of its kind". No project activity of this type is currently operational in the host country or region.
- Barriers due to local ecological conditions, inter alia:
- Degraded soil (e.g. water/wind erosion, salination);
- Catastrophic natural and/or human-induced events (e.g. land slides, fire);
- Unfavourable meteorological conditions (e.g. early/late frost, drought);
- Pervasive opportunistic species preventing regeneration of trees (e.g. grasses, weeds);
- Unfavourable course of ecological succession;
- Biotic pressure in terms of grazing, fodder collection, etc.
- Barriers due to social conditions, inter alia:
- Demographic pressure on the land (e.g. increased demand on land due to population growth);
- Social conflict among interest groups in the region where the project activity takes place;
- Widespread illegal practices (e.g. illegal grazing, non-timber product extraction and tree felling);
- Lack of skilled and/or properly trained labour force;
- Lack of organization of local communities.
